Internet Banking Security Assessment Considerations

Aug 05, 2008 in Banking and EFTPoS, Security

I was asked some time ago what sort of things may be considered when looking at .

Below is a list of things which could be considered. It was just a brain dump and as such may not be complete.

Don’t underestimate the value of standard for your infrastructure, website configuration,  database engine configuration/, environment and /QA environments.

Some thoughts:

  • Many don’t lock accounts after X failed logins, this is normally done for good customer service, but leaves the system .

- And all the other things expected for a session (forced password changes, aging, etc))
- Tools such as may be use to brute force authenticated sessions.

  • Many allow session sequence numbers to be incremented, allowing an authenticated user to view other customer session.

- These may be side, client side, cookie based, etc.
- Get someone to check the methodologies and the code being used.
- Database query strings can be placed into test entry fields, allowing table dumps to browser.
- Check all pages served are secure and contain user flags.

  • Customer may not be segregated, this needs to be checked.
  • Customer should not reside on the .
  • databases / system should not reside on the webserver.
  • The databases should reside on a private/semi-private .

- A different segment to the main system.

  • Webserver should be dual homed or equivalent (some VLAN techniques are good)

- Separate private and public cards, monitoring/backup/administration
- Infrastructure set-up to explicitly deny inbound/outbound ports, private IP & monitoring escaping from the .

  • At all segregation points ensure rules are in place which appreciates the traffic though that point.
  • All customer where possible should be sourced from a secure back-end database.

- This may be a environment. i.e. no the main system.
- This usually allows for transactions to appear real time to the customer.
- Many transactions may be batched in reality. (internal or external to the )

  • Ensure suitable rules have been set-up on firewalls.

- There should be inbound and outbound rules on firewalls and filtering routers.

  • Don’t allow any infrastructure on the front end to allow remote administrative connections. (, etc.)

- Use the serial console port to connect to a or back-end terminal .

  • Look for the segregation / of online customer content from main systems
  • Ensure that a separate / QA / production environment system and suitable process is in place.
  • Services not used by the system are active

- These should be disabled.

  • Port scan of the supporting infrastructure (routers /switches) and (s).

- Investigate the reasons for all open ports.

  • Don’t use the main gateway for trusted partner (clearing / RAS / etc.)
  • Do all that standard IIS checks and NT checks (Sample scripts, change management, methodologies, etc.)
  • Ensure denial of service precaution have been taken into account for all infrastructure and equipment.
  • Check the adequacy of the escalation procedures used.

- Look for real-time monitoring and alerting.
- Look for responsibility matrix.
- Look for ownership of issues.

  • Consider upstream carrier(s) (denial of service, IP spoofing, , etc)
  • Consider social engineering of customer, administrative, partner accounts / systems / infrastructure.

- Helpdesk procedures and policies and/or alternate technologies (Caller ID, Gateway IP, etc.).

  • Use dynamic passwords where possible (SecureID, TACACS, etc.).
  • Use encrypted tunnelling where needed (, Firewall 1, etc)
  • Consider looking at other customer methods to enhance existing methods.

- Digital cert, IP address locked to account, etc.
- Consider use of or CVN for issued cards.

  • Consider how passwords are distributed /changed for customers.

- Plain text email, telephone, etc.
- Can passwords be changed online?

  • Is additional used between sections of the services once authenticated?
  • Consider what the customer has to once authenticated.

- Look at , RTGS, inter- transfers, to cards, etc.
- If an attacker does get in, what can the do?

  • Use techniques to ensure pages, customer details are not cached at , or client system.

- These are flags that can be set within pages.
- Normally SSL is cached, but some proxy vendors have been playing with techniques to do so.
- Caching of SSL pages on the client system can be turned on on some browsers.
- May banks use a (or similar) applet for all customer interaction, restricting all caching issues.

  • Ensure paper based and on-line liability clauses are available are address all effected areas.
  • Ensure within the customer sign-up process liability is reduced.

- I’ve seen statements like “use this system at your own risk, responsibility for any liability or claim will NOT……”
- Not very customer focused, but that’s what their legal department recommended.

All of the above can effect the and/or operation of an on-line system.

Other things to consider:

  • External and of the application.
  • Ownership and management of the /applications
  • Publishing points for new content (internal/private/trusted or )
  • Topology of front end.  i.e. document should be in place and managed appropriately.
  • Are limited AP tests performed whenever changes are made to the environment? i.e. integrated AP into Change management process.
  • Database . Is it buffered or is it live to the core systems.
  • What facilities are provided? Direct debit + Card + + ……. Consider different scenarios for your depending on the feature.
  • What other services are shared within the segment that the service is running. Can this be used to compromise the site. eg. different /business/ organisations with differing strategies/profiles.
  • Consider all external supporting services within you AP. Look at internal/external poisoning opportunities, mail relay, etc. What IPS’s do they use has the any opportunity to systems or supporting services which may affect .
  • Depending on the size of the , many organisation do not use the same groups for infrastructure and the application. As a result external connections to the infrastructure may be provided for an external organisation to administer the infrastructure.
  • Look at the business and user methods and paths (client side certs, secure ID, , etc). Consider two factor and modern user methods. eg. what is your favourite food in addition to normal usernames and passwords. Do system administration staff use dynamic passwords (secureID, etc)?
  • See if the application sends email to users which may contain interesting information.
  • Better to the application can generally be gained after to the system. i.e. get an legitimate account on the system. I have found that some sample/administration screens have been restricted to authenticated users only.
  • Consider social engineering the Help desk to have an account password reset.

DNS Hack Needs Patching - Serious Problem

Jul 10, 2008 in Security

This has been kept under wraps by the Operating System and vendors for the last few weeks and now patches have finally been released for many , software applications and devices.
If you provide or rely on DNZ services (external and Internal) you should consider quickly your servers/devices.

Although Internal servers may not be exposed to an , we see many more internal attacks within larger organisations which involve or services being established within the firewalled trusted . As a result, this lifts the level of internal systems/services and therefore the need for effective timely .

Also consider asking the question of your hosting facility, upstream or provider to see if they have patched their servers and forwarders.

http://www.doxpara.com/?p=1162 This link also has a checker.
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hwFqcnWAuDWlcqfvfyHu5PGG9RMQ
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113

This is a full list of vendor links
http://www.betanews.com/article/Major_fix_to_DNS_vulnerability_impacts_Windows_Debian/1215551008

Good Luck