Technobile: Chip and pin may be a wonderful concept, but don’t write off humans yet - they’re more reliable

Mar 24, 2008 in Banking and EFTPoS

Pages
28 September 2006
The

“Your has been declined.”
“What? No way, there’s plenty of in that !”
“I’m sorry, madam, but it’s refusing the .”
“It’s your , that worked fine in Boots five minutes ago.”
“The has been declined. Do you have another one?”
The casual might infer that I - the protesting woman in that dialogue - am financially irresponsible, that my is maxed out or my has reached its overdraft limit. In fact, it’s far more likely that the on the and machine is throwing a strop. There is a machine at WH Smith in North End Road, Fulham, that hates my and never accepts it. I’ve given up trying there. But it’s not the only one.
machines have sprung up everywhere, sprouting readers and keypads. But watch closely and you will find that more often than not, there is an angry person muttering and swearing at the machine while a queue forms. Watch a little longer and you’ll see that queue evaporate - and reform at the counter in front of a human being.
This happened to me and my partner in France recently when we pulled into a petrol station in Epernay. In our desperation, we pulled up at an empty pump, wondering vaguely why it had no queue while others did.
Why? Because before it would dispense petrol, it wanted a and . We fed it mine and I keyed in the number, only for it to be spat out with terrifying admonitions in French about the being refused. I wiped the strip and tried again. Same reaction, causing a moment’s panic: we’d spent a bit on that - did my think it was stolen? Was it blocked?
So we tried my partner’s . Same thing. And then the penny dropped that the pumps with the queues were the old-fashioned ones where you fill the car up and then pay at the till. Clearly the locals knew all about these pumps.
Mind you, it was a miracle we got to France at all. When we arrived at the Eurotunnel terminus we joined a queue of cars for the automatic check-in. I am not the most patient of queuers and within a short time I was railing about how slowly it was moving. A man in a bright yellow jacket was buzzing about from car to car. Finally we got to the head of the queue and fed in the that was used to book the shuttle .
It didn’t want to know. It spat the out. We tried again and got as far as tapping in our reservation number. It spat it out again. The chap in the high-visibility jacket buzzed over to us and rolled his eyes, saying: “It’s been playing up all day.” He went into the booth with the - and then we heard him saying over his that the whole system had gone down in protest.
As an idea, the is great. In practice, we have a long way to go before we can dispense with human beings who can override systems when good readers go bad. Kate Bevan

© Copyright 2006. The . All rights reserved.

Are MIFARE and ISO/IEC 14443 Type A the same?

Mar 24, 2008 in RFID

MIFARE and ISO/ 14443 A are not the same. While MIFARE is often viewed as an extension to or subset of ISO/ 14443 A, it is a proprietary /conditional protocol owned and licensed by Philips to multiple vendors of ICs and ICs.

Because MIFARE has been so predominantly used with products employing ISO/ 14443 A , it has mistakenly become synonymous with the standard. However, ISO/ 14443 A is a completely open standard when used independently of the MIFARE /conditional scheme.

What changes to contactless standards and technology are expected in the future?

Mar 24, 2008 in RFID

Many vendors are actively developing new technologies to address the increasing market need for secure for a wide variety of applications. Changes in government regulations will also provide opportunities for enhancing contactless performance. It is important to note, however, that is a lengthy process so it takes time for new developments to be reflected in that help to drive the availability of interoperable solutions. A few examples of new technologies that are expected include:

  • Changes to based on the ISO/ 15693 standard. supporting the ISO/ 15693 standard currently operate at 1.65 Kb/sec to meet FCC limits on sideband power in this range. The FCC is expected to lift its restriction in late 2002, which would allow cards based on the ISO/ 15693 standard to improve their rates.
  • Changes for higher speed operation. ISO working groups plan to add higher speed modes of operation to ISO/ 14443. This will increase the speed supported by this standard from 106 Kb/sec to the 848 Kb/sec that has already been demonstrated by IC manufacturers.
  • Alternative control networking solutions. Wireless readers offer a significant advantage in lower costs of installation, particularly in older facilities. New approaches can ensure strong authenticated channels between hosts or panels and new wireless readers. IP readers also permit direct connectivity to LANbased management and control applications.
  • The ability for a single contactless in a to operate in full ISO/ 14443 and ISO/ 15693 modes.

Is there a risk of someone “listening” or “stealing” the information from a contactless card?

Mar 24, 2008 in RFID

One risk with is the ability for the to be activated when it enters a ’s RF range without the owner being aware of it. To prevent a contactless activation without the owner being aware of it, the application can be configured to always ask for the owner’s (, or biometric) before providing any user information or on the user’s behalf.

e level of of communication required between the contactless and the must be defined as part of the system design and controls must put in place so that un-invited listeners cannot intercept the in any meaningful way. For example, all of the can use to protect on the and during ; this helps to ensure that, if information is intercepted, the information cannot be used by the recipient. It is important that all of the application’s requirements be understood and defined prior to any selection and implementation so that the appropriate features are designed into the system.
Additionally, the contactless is designed to self destruct if anyone tries to into it.

What do you mean by three technologies on one card?

Mar 24, 2008 in RFID

There is confusing terminology used in the market to refer to cards that can a combination of technologies. Cards are described as multiple when multiple, independent technologies share a common plastic and do not communicate or interact with each other (e.g., and contactless or contact ). Cards are described as having a “dual-” when the has a single integrated (IC) that can communicate with a smart /terminal via either contact or contactless.

RFID Cloning Documents and Images

Mar 24, 2008 in RFID

Images of RFID Tags

RFID Cloning

Interesting Links 

http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/lost-in-transit-no-more/2006/11/30/1164777706811.html 

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2302505,00.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RFID 

http://www.workpermit.com/news/2006_08_04/rfid_technology_cloned.htm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/idcards/story/0,,1950226,00.html 

Vulnerabilities in First-Generation RFID-enabled Credit Cards

Mar 24, 2008 in RFID

from: http://prisms.cs.umass.edu/~kevinfu/papers/-CC-manuscript.pdf

RFID-CC-manuscript.pdf

This is a great article, worth a read.

Visa Competes with Payment Systems

Mar 24, 2008 in Banking and EFTPoS

27 September 2006
Kommersant International

The New System will be Offered to 20 Banks<br>Yesterday, at a press conference dedicated to the five-millionth issued by Sberbank, International representative Oliver Hughes announced that a project introducing a system of -to- transfers in Russia has launched its third stage. The project, called Transfer (VMT), is now being tested in six Russian banks. Also yesterday, Rosbank announced its intention to participate in the trial. Twenty organizations have expressed interest in joining the program, of which ten will be included in the project within the next year. The trial phase of the program will last another six months, after which the VMT system is expected to be unveiled in its full form. The VMT system allows any cardholder to electronically transfer or receive funds to or from another cardholder via an ATM . To make the , all that is needed is the other cardholder’s number. Though the company “at this point is not positioning the new service as an alternative to the system of traditional transfers,” VMT promises to be competition for that system. The only restriction is that the laws of the Russian Federation permit such transfers to be made in Russia only in rubles. Market analysts believe that the success of the system will depend on ’s commission policies. commissions for transfers stand at around 1%, and if ’s commission is more than 0.5%, it is predicted that banks will find it hard to do business within the project. According to some sources, the commission earned by the whose client sends the transfer will be 1% of the transfer sum. The whose client receives the will make $0.48 on each . The commission charged by the system will be $0.05 + $1. Many Russian banks have expressed interest in the project, but most for now are observing the program’s from the sidelines, preferring to judge for themselves its power to attract customers. http://www.kommersant.com/photo/75/DAILY/2006/180/KMO_032838_00111_1h_t75.jpg
http://www.kommersant.com/photo/512/DAILY/2006/180/KNN_001535_00046_1m.jpg
http://www.kommersant.com/photo/512/DAILY/2006/180/KMO_073625_00010_1m.jpg
http://www.kommersant.com/photo/512/DAILY/2006/180/KMO_069500_00019_1m.jpg

© 2006 ZAO Kommersant Publishing House. All rights reserved. ЗАО Коммерсантъ. Издательский Дом. Все права защищены.

New e-Commerce and Payment Technologies Company

Mar 24, 2008 in Banking and EFTPoS

Recently I came across a new e- company called Networks, which seems to have an exciting future in the Global Payments Market.

It looks like they have a good mix of consulting and solution design.

www.eftnetworks.com

Services

Designed to enable both and direct , Networks solutions work effectively across multiple sales channels—including , Contact Call Centre, IVR and EFTPOS. Manage your system in-house or outsource, depending on your business needs.

Global Payments

International requires fully integrated global and risk management solutions. Requirements span the gamut of acceptance considerations from accepting local types, pricing in local currencies and dynamically updating prices with changes in exchange rates (dynamic currency conversion), authorising and settling in multiple currencies, to managing fraud and compliance issues such as tax and export regulations. Networks offers a single to the global to handle all of these considerations as your business grows.

ICE - & Management

The Networks Business Center gives you a single, easy-to-use for managing and configuring services.

ICE caters for each area of the cycle from , , , dispute resolution and reconciliation – enabling our clients to reduce costs, eliminate fraud, minimise risk, maximise cash flow and increase profitability.

Integrations

Networks provides flexible and secure and risk management integrations in to host and legacy systems as well as industry-leading software.

Using industry and protocols, our solutions can be customised to suit your exact business requirements

Products

ICE (Intelligent Exchange)

At the core is our Intelligent Exchange (ICE) which enables all known enablers from EFTPOS to eCommerce to be routed directly to a client’s without intervention for real time acceptance and .

The Networks ICE operates under a philosophy of total System and Physical redundancy delivering the highest uptime rates possible, whilst the is protected using Solid State and Application Firewalls on all points of ingress and egress.

Every processed through Networks is encrypted using 128 bit Secure Socket Layer (SSL) and submitted for through Networks “Secure Virtual Private ” (SVPN).

Our commitment to is also reflected in our compliance with Schemes initiatives such as VerifiedByVisa and MasterCard SecureCode.

Networks comprehensive suit of tools combined with daily reports will ensure that our clients always have to up-to-date management information allowing Business Managers to make quick and well-informed business decisions. The decision making process is simplified even further with the power of daily reports that are customised to be imported into most existing legacy systems.

VISA Credit or Debit - The Big Question

Oct 06, 2007 in Banking and EFTPoS

I have been astounded by the take-up by holders and the push from the major banks in , for customer to embrace the instead of the traditional .

This, although advantageous to the banks, provides a much higher risk to the holder, especially if the is used or in a location where the could be skimmed.

The problem and the advantage of the is that it allows to your savings funds via a .

This sounds great in theory, as there is no need to transfer from your savings to periodically pay off the .

The problem exists where the is skimmed or stolen and is withdrawn from the . These funds are taken directly from the holder savings and not , therefore this increases the risk to the holder not being able to pay bills/mortgage/loans/etc.

In the traditional world, if the was skimmed or stolen, the dept remains the responsibility and risk of the , until the fraudulent is investigated.

With the this risk is placed upon the holder, who is often convinced to get one of these cards through good television marketing, when opening a new or establishing an off-set loan, with no idea of the associated risks.

I don’t like the increased risks associated with these cards not being explained adequately to the holders so the holder can make an educated decision as to where he/she uses the (, , periodic payments, charges, etc.)p>

This risk assumes that the holder does not rely on only to live and does not have any savings to withdraw, but the banks may not give you a anyway if this is the case.